Top Government Scientists Refuse to Vaccinate Their Children

How shocking is it that New Mexico, the school district with the highest percentage of students whose families are opting out of vaccines, is actually one of the state’s most scientifically literate communities?

Well, if you know how harmful vaccines really are, you might not really be all that surprised. But for many, the 2.3 percent of students forgoing traditional vaccine regimens in Los Alamos is causing quite the upset.

After all, many of the parents in the community work for US Los Alamos Labs, or one of the other scientific organizations that call the area home. For example, the Los Alamos National Laboratory has even conducted extensive research and development on a vaccine for HIV.

The Superintendent of the Los Alamos school systems has said that he finds the high rate of parents exempting their children from vaccination “curious,” given that it is a “pretty scientific and literate community.”

While the mainstream media continues to come up with all kinds of wild  reasons for why “anti-vaxxers” don’t vaccinate their children, a community of scientists continues to abstain from the practice, much to the chagrin of pro-vaccine activists. Los Alamos is not alone; Santa Fe’s percentage of children not getting jabbed was just a few points behind, at 2.1 percent.

Anna Pentler, the head of the New Mexico Immunization Coalition (a pro-vaccine group) seems to think that not wanting to inject their children with toxic adjuvants and heavy metals is an “emotional issue,” and not an issue of ethics and morality. She says that while the science could be “99 to 1″ in favor of vaccines, a parent’s anecdotal story of how vaccines harmed their child could easily sway another parent’s opinion.

While it is true that the countless horror stories that many parents and children are forced to endure post-vaccination are enough to give any reasonable parent pause, the fact is that the science behind vaccine damage is also all there. The problem is that no one wants to believe it; no one wants their reality disrupted.

As the Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute states, “[T]here is a large body of scientific evidence confirming numerous vaccine safety deficits that counteract well-publicized benefits. For example, several studies show that thimerosal (mercury) and aluminum in vaccines can cause neurological, immunological and developmental harm.”

The CDC itself has conducted investigations on the harmful effects of certain ingredients in vaccines, and found that they did in fact disrupt neurological development in young children. But the mainstream media doesn’t care about that; they want you to fall in line and do your “due diligence” by getting vaccinated to maintain society’s “herd immunity” – which isn’t even real, by the way.

The vaccine agenda is one based on smoke and mirrors; its all a ruse to hide the harmful effects of vaccines that are felt worldwide. And it seems that the scientists in Los Alamos are brave enough to go against the grain, rather than putting their children in harm’s way just to satisfy society.

Share This

3 thoughts on “Top Government Scientists Refuse to Vaccinate Their Children

  • June 21, 2018 at 10:17 pm
    Permalink

    Do those scientists families have natural immunity to polio, small pox and other life threatrning, and damaging diseases? How can their children be protected against them?

    Reply
    • June 26, 2018 at 8:49 pm
      Permalink

      The polio vaccine was an embarrassment to modern science. Did you know it’s nearly impossible to test for polio? Even a spinal tap doesn’t work. They used to diagnose all cases of paralysis as polio. What was really causing “polio” at the time was DDTs. After its discontinuation the amount of “polio” cases went down. A couple years later the polio vaccine came out and then that was giving people polio. Bill Gates pushed the polio vaccine onto the Indian people and now tens of thousands of children are paralyzed and it’s the ignorance around vaccines that is causing these unneeded injuries. We really don’t need many if any vaccines. We have all been duped. And before you say “there are children in third world countries dying from preventable diseases” remember that they have a poor quality of life, malnutrition, poor water quality, no health care, weak immune system. What a lot of people don’t realize is that if you have a healthy immune system you won’t die from most of these diseases. The measles is a mild illness contrary to common belief in the western world because that’s what they were told. So what vaccine do we really need? Small pox has been eradicated for awhile now

      Reply
    • July 9, 2018 at 12:00 am
      Permalink

      STOP giving credit to vaccines for eradicating diseases that they didn’t. ? Polio (licensed in 1955), hepatitis A (1995) and B (1991), mumps (1967), measles (1963), and pertussis (1949), were all on the decline BEFORE the vaccines were introduced.

      Mortality in all areas with all diseases were significantly decreased BEFORE the vaccine came on the scene. Instead of looking at deceptive CDC graphs that give credit where credit’s not due, try plugging in the year of licensure on both prevalence and mortality charts and discover where the decline occurred for yourself. For prevalence of polio refer to “Incidence of poliomyelitis” in the USA from CDC, 1972.
      P.S. Polio is asymptomatic in over 90% of cases. When symptoms do present, they’re usually mild and flu-like. And don’t just take MY word for it, do some digging for yourself. The CDC website is a great place to start.
      Put your thinking cap on and be ready to have your mind blown

      Here’s one of my favorite articles on the subject: �https://www.livingwhole.org/dear-parents-are-you-being-lie…/

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *